Session Flow Examples

Recent Session Flow Examples

Review recent Session Flow examples to understand how the workflow marks candidate EURUSD M5 setups, risk-planning levels, and outcomes.

These examples are shared for educational transparency only. They are not audited performance results, trading advice, or a guarantee of future results. Each example highlights the chart context, setup type, Entry/SL/TP planning, and what happened after the setup was triggered.

Educational Transparency

Latest Reviewed Setup

A recent EURUSD M5 example showing the setup context, planned levels, and outcome notes from the Session Flow workflow.

Last Session Flow EURUSD example chart Open chart
Last Example

EURUSD M5 Long Candidate

The latest reviewed example shows a May 31 EURUSD M5 long setup with bullish H1 bias and bullish M15 structure. The setup used a planned entry near 1.16537, stop near 1.16408, and target references at 1.16627 and 1.16743 before the outcome marker showed TP2 after TP1.

DateMay 31, 2026
SymbolEURUSD
TimeframeM5
OutcomeTP2 after TP1

Shared as an educational example only.

Screenshot Date Setup Entry Zone SL TP1 / TP2 Outcome
May 31 Session Flow example May 31, 2026 Long 1.16537 area 1.16408 TP1 1.16627 / TP2 1.16743 TP2 after TP1
The setup-quality review marked a long candidate with bullish H1 context and bullish M15 structure. Price reached the planned target area and the outcome marker showed TP2 after TP1 during the reviewed session.
May 27 Session Flow example May 27, 2026 Long 1.1648 area 1.16385 TP1 near entry / TP2 1.16537 SL before TP1
The setup-quality review marked a long candidate with bullish H1 context and bullish M15 structure. Price moved against the planned long setup after entry, and the outcome marker showed stop loss before TP1 during the reviewed session.
May 25 Session Flow example May 25, 2026 Long 1.16490 area 1.16403 TP1 1.16551 / TP2 1.16630 SL before TP1
The setup-quality review marked a long candidate with bullish H1 context and mixed M15 structure. Price moved against the planned long setup and the outcome marker showed stop loss before TP1 during the reviewed session.
May 22 Session Flow example May 22, 2026 — Trade 2 Short 1.16034 area 1.16075 TP1 1.15979 / TP2 1.15882 TP2 same bar
The second short candidate triggered around 09:30 with bearish H1 bias and mixed M15 structure (Score 95). The outcome marker showed TP2 hit on the same bar as TP1 during the reviewed session.
May 22, 2026 — Trade 1 Short 1.15965 area 1.16283 TP1 1.15900 / TP2 1.15799 SL before TP1
The first short candidate triggered around 07:00 with bearish H1 bias and mixed M15 structure (Score 65). Price reversed before reaching TP1 and the outcome marker showed stop loss hit before TP1.
May 21 Session Flow example May 21, 2026 Short 1.15929 area 1.16136 TP1 1.15826 / TP2 1.15640 Exit after timeout
The short candidate was triggered with mixed H1 bias and mixed M15 structure. The outcome marker showed exit after timeout as the setup did not reach the planned targets within the session window.
May 19 Session Flow example May 19, 2026 Short 1.16200 area 1.16355 TP1 1.16097 / TP2 1.15953 TP2 after TP1
The setup-quality review marked a short candidate with bearish H1 context and mixed M15 structure. The outcome marker showed TP2 after TP1 during the reviewed session.
May 15 Session Flow example May 15, 2026 Short 1.16295 area 1.16410 TP1 1.16158 / TP2 1.16025 Exit after timeout
The take-profit target was adjusted to break-even following a system timeout, as the setup-quality review indicated a lower probability of reaching the primary targets.
May 14 Session Flow example May 14, 2026 Short 1.1708 area 1.17076 TP1 1.16884 / TP2 1.16782 Setup expired
The short candidate expired after the setup window closed without a confirmed continuation through the planned levels.
May 13 Session Flow example May 13, 2026 Short 1.1705 area 1.17209 TP1 1.16949 / TP2 1.16811 Exit after timeout
The take-profit target was adjusted to break-even following a system timeout, as the setup-quality review indicated a lower probability of reaching the primary targets.
Disclaimer: Recent examples are shown for transparency and education only. They are not audited performance results, not trading advice, and not a guarantee of future outcomes. Broker execution, spreads, slippage, timing, and user decisions may produce different results.